![]() |
> Christianity > Bible > Interpretation > | ||
| Feminist Biblical Hermeneutics | |||
| This typology is taken from Carolyn Osiek ("The Feminist and the Bible" Hermeneutical Alternatives," 1985.) She is not responsible for how I've condensed it or interpreted it. | |||
| She describes five approaches: | |
|
1. "Rejectionist." The Bible is not authoritative. The entire tradition is sexist and corrupt. The whole enterprise is misogynist and perpetuates violence against women. |
|
| 2. "Revisionist." The text is patriarchal, but that is an accident of how it was transmitted, not part of its essential nature. | |
| 3. "Sublimationist." There are feminine symbols in the Bible that can be drawn out and developed. | |
| 4. "Liberationist." The proper stance to the Bible is to use it to promote liberation. All interpretations are "interested," and non liberationist interpretations have to be rejected. | |
| 5. "Loyalist." The Bible is the ultimate authority. Since it comes from God it cannot really be oppressive. | |