|
|
The anti-religion movement A rush of antireligious books recently is reinforcing the idea that nothing constructive can be done here. But there has been a great deal of polite, constructive, detailed work. See the links. Models of the relationship Ian Baurbor, the dean of scholars in this area has proposed four models for thinking about the ways science and religion interact. Evolution I am from Kansas, so I am particularly appalled at the actions of the Kansas school board in regard to practically banning the teaching of evolution in schools. You may be surprised to learn that not all Christians care to trample on Science. In fact, I would strongly suspect that Lutheran church colleges are teaching it in their biology departments. Opposition to evolution is connected to a primitive reading of the Bible. Those who recognize the poetic nature of its instruction don't see the problem. God created the universe and all the laws of physics. If species evolve, then God made evolution. |
Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind. Nature and Nature's laws lay hit in night; Links A key institution is the The Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences at the Graduate Theological Union in Berkeley, CA. (Up 11/29/07; posted 9/22/00) International Society for Science and Religion Out of the UK (Up 11/29/07)
On the not so serious side |
| Last updated 11/30/07; first posted 9/22/00; original content © 2007, 2000 John P. Nordin |