Main

May 04, 2008

Laura Berg: American Hero

The New York Times reports (April 27, 2008, p. 11) the strange case of V.A. nurse Laura Berg. She wrote a letter critiquing government policy. And the next thing she knew, her office computer had been seized and she was accused of “sedition.” According to Reason Magazine she got a response from some nit in the V.A. named Mel Hooker who wrote her that “You have insulted the very government that employs you, and the agency has a responsibility to investigate you for possible sedition."

After the ACLU and a senator got involved, the VA climbed down and apologized to her.

But, let’s pause for a moment at this claim that she “insulted” the government. That does take one’s breath away, doesn’t it? Has the cult of personality around right-wing leaders now spread out to the government itself as an entity that must be worshipped and its majesty not ‘insulted’ by pointing out that (the case Berg was making) that Katrina response was a big failure?

And has Mr. Hooker been fired? Disciplined? Apparently not. The VA says they’ve “moved on.” It should come as no surprise to anyone who’s ever worked in a large company that Hooker is in that totally misnamed “human resources” department.

And Berg’s characterization of the current junta in Washington as having “misplaced priorities” and suffering from “criminal negligence” is still true, isn’t it?

June 17, 2007

Mission Al Jazeera

The new book by Josh Rushing

I admit that I admire Rushing. From his first appearance in the movie Control Room through the last page of this book he is unfailingly calm, reasonable and even handed; not something we have a surplus of these days. His personal journey is compelling, but his mission: to break down barriers of misunderstanding between Americans and the world confident that most people everywhere want to live in peace is one I strongly believe in.

The book mirrors this. He recounts his personal story, his upbringing, his career in the Marines, his frustration with the political appointees who shaped relations with the media during the early days of the Iraq war and his transition out of the Marines due to their distaste with his appearance in Control Room. By the way, he explains that almost all of the film of him in that movie comes from one interview, and doesn’t really reflect an arc of growth over a period of time.

My only frustration with the book is that because he so calm, that he doesn’t provide many of the juicy details I was hoping for. Some are there, and my favorites are the stories of the arch-conservative spokespeople who orate against the evil of Al Jazera and then accept money from it for interviews. But even then he can’t bring himself to indulge in inflated rhetoric and violent denunciations. Probably a good thing.

Most of the book is given to him arguing his case for increased and open interaction with the Arab world and the key role that interacting with Al Jazera could play in that. He points out that, by one survey, Al Jazera is the number one media brand in the world. He defends the network against some common distortions (it has never, not once, shown a beheading, for example) and reminds readers that Al Jazera has been thrown out of most of the Arab world for its honest reporting.

One of the interesting ironies is that Israel is more open about interacting with Al Jazera than is American media. Israeli government spokespeople appear on the network regularly; American’s refuse.

Rushing’s vision of the world is hopeful and compelling. His tag line on the book is reflected on every page: “Build a bridge, seek the truth, change the world.”

September 25, 2006

Congressman Tim Ryan, American Hero

Hey, there is one Democrat with a backbone after all! Check out Tim Ryan schooling Bush here. Also check out “unable to govern” and “Tim Ryan tells it like it is”

September 03, 2006

Keith Olbermann, American Hero

Let’s remind ourselves what Secretary of Defense, Donald Rmsfeld actually said at both the VFW and the American Legion. First some words from the VFW speech:

We're really fighting the first war of the 21st century, the first war that's been fought in the new media realities with bloggers and 24-hour talk radio and Internet and e-mails and video cameras, digital cameras. Things speed around the world so rapidly, truth generally takes a long time to catch up with untruth.
As our forces strive to protect civilians, the enemy uses civilians as shields. As our troops strive to obey the laws of warfare, the enemy uses those laws against us. And as our troops are held to the standards of mere perfection, the enemy is held to no standard at all. And while some at home argue for tossing in the towel, the enemy is waiting and hoping that we will do just that.

At the American Legion he said:

It was a time when a certain amount of cynicism and moral confusion set in among Western democracies. When those who warned about a coming crisis, the rise of fascism and nazism, they were ridiculed or ignored. Indeed, in the decades before World War II, a great many argued that the fascist threat was exaggerated or that it was someone else's problem. Some nations tried to negotiate a separate peace, even as the enemy made its deadly ambitions crystal clear. It was, as Winston Churchill observed, a bit like feeding a crocodile, hoping it would eat you last.
There was a strange innocence about the world. Someone recently recalled one U.S. senator's reaction in September of 1939 upon hearing that Hitler had invaded Poland to start World War II. He exclaimed: “Lord, if only I had talked to Hitler, all of this might have been avoided!”
And it's a time when Amnesty International refers to the military facility at Guantanamo Bay -- which holds terrorists who have vowed to kill Americans and which is arguably the best run and most scrutinized detention facility in the history of warfare -- as "the gulag of our times." It’s inexcusable. (Applause.)

Those who know the truth need to speak out against these kinds of myths and distortions that are being told about our troops and about our country. America is not what's wrong with the world. (Applause.)

The struggle we are in -- the consequences are too severe -- the struggle too important to have the luxury of returning to that old mentality of “Blame America First.”

The rhetorical move here, as BushCo often do, is to confuse themselves with America. Criticize the current administration, and you are criticizing America. Further, Rumsfeld puts the blame on low-ranking troops (“in every army, there are occasional bad actors, the ones who dominate the headlines today, who don't live up to the standards of the oath and of our country.”) for his own mistakes. It is Rmsfeld who put the troops there, gave them a confused strategy, told them to fight an insurgency with conventional tactics.

And then, of course, he equates people who disagree with him to appeasers.

Olbermann replied:

...it credits those same transient occupants, our employees, with a total omniscience, a total omniscience which neither commonsense nor this administration‘s track record, at home or abroad, suggest they deserve it.

that about what Mr. Rumsfeld is confused is simply this, this is a democracy, still, sometimes just barely and as such, all voices count, not just his.

But to date, this government has proved little besides its own arrogance and its own hubris. Mr. Rumsfeld is also personally confused, morally or intellectually, about his standing in this matter. From Iraq to Katrina, to flu vaccine shortages to the entire fog of fear which continues to envelopes our nation, he, Mr. Bush, Mr. Cheney and their cronies have inadvertently or intentionally profited and benefited, both personally and politically.
And yet he can stand up in public and question the morality and the intellect of those of us who dare ask just the receipt for the emperor new clothes.

Aptly, he reversed the appeasement analogy, pointing out that it was the government back in the 30s that was wrong, as the government is wrong today. And he wisely closed with timeless words from Edward R. Murrow:

"We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty” he said in 1954, “We must remember always that accusation is not proof and that conviction depends upon evidence and due process of law. We will not walk in fear one of another. We will not be driven by fear into an age of unreason if we dig deep in our history and our doctrine, and remember that we are not disended from fearful men, not from men who fear to write, to speak, to associate and to defend causes that were, for the moment, unpopular. "

It took a lot of courage for Olbermann to rebut so strongly Rumsfeld, a courage Howard Dean just couldn’t quite match earlier in the show. And it courage for his bosses to allow him six minutes to stand up for freedom.

Keith Olbermann, American Hero.

May 04, 2006

Stephen Colbert: American Patriot

Stephen Colbert: American Patriot

By now, you’ve likely heard of Stephen Colbert’s ripping of the President, the Media, the Generals and everyone else at the Correspondent’s dinner. Daily Kos has the transcript.

And maybe you’ve already heard the conservative reaction in our doormat media: “over the top”, “not respectful”, “wasn’t really that funny.” Yes, of course, we really do need to take lessons from the Republicans in how to respect a president, don’t we? Let’s go play some Clinton transcripts again.

Maybe Colbert wasn’t side splittingly funny. But this is the era when humorists are the real commentators, the ones with weight and credibility. And what Colbert did was satire, and he did it well.

Speaking of how his TV character and the President are so much alike he said:

We go straight from the gut, right sir? That's where the truth lies, right down here in the gut. Do you know you have more nerve endings in your gut than you have in your head? You can look it up. I know some of you are going to say "I did look it up, and that's not true." That's 'cause you looked it up in a book.
Next time, look it up in your gut. I did. My gut tells me that's how our nervous system works.

There we have the telling response to Bush’s weird adoption of the postmodern ethic that things can mean what we spin them to mean, that things can be “true for me” and it doesn’t matter what others say.

Continue reading "Stephen Colbert: American Patriot" »